You're going to have to sit still and read for almost 2 minutes to get this!

We'll be talking about our current leadership but do you not think that if these types of questions were applied throughout the ages that our country might not be in a little bit better of a position?

You may try to presume which side we sit on but you would be wrong...We're here to roast E'ERBODY...and we align with the side of practical common sense!

Not each highly polarized sides perceptions thereof! 

Check it out:

Quite simply no. This is slightly contradictory to our point, but we're about the FACTS!

ASD, or Autism Spectrum Disorder is NOT a "mental illness", but is vastly, scientifically considered a:

Neurological, developmental disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate, socialize, and learn. (So it affects behavior...)  However a person with ASD often also has varying other disorders and associated mental illness in addition to their neurological, behavioral disorder(s).

But, no, specifically it was reclassified around 2013 as not a "mental illness".

Again in short, No. Obviously not ASD in this scenario, but even considering associated illnesses/dual diagnosis/etc...

"Mental Illness" is not a blanket disqualification from serving in public office. Especially considering the term could be used loosely by political rivals in smear campaigns. The Constitution has a pretty distinct focus on capacities, as in, your ability to perform the required duties of each particular office.

It's difficult, but a key thing to remember here: 

If any of us/We begin to allow loose interpretations to be applied to laws, the whole system will break down.

While many of you would be, wannabe anarchists say: "yeah burn it down!"

You bit** and complain and cry if the fire department didn't show up. You know, that one created and supported by the system?

The same system that helps left, right, AND middle with tax breaks and free money back on WAY MORE than the taxes ANYONE pays really. Just handing out money to ungrateful complainers, who would see the system, they rely on, dismantled...I digress... Point there, you can't just loosely interpret things the way you want to, based on your sensitivities and TV screen! You/We go by the letter of the law!

So, a president can essentially, obviously, make whomever a cabinet member once they're the president. So, The first layer of protection is you see someone running for president or a "votable" office, you see they have mental illness, you don't vote for them. 

However, if/once they do win, They can stack the cabinet with as many "destructive crackpots" as they want! Depending on that person's externally perceived capacity to perform required duties of that position...

So you got to rock the vote b/c I'm nut like me can legally run for president! 

I probably wouldn't push the button, but I'm sure I current leadership would have no problem! They blast nuclear rockets into space frequently, tearing up to ozone for prestigious fame claims. It's pretty obvious they're less concerned about the world/future as a whole.

So while it's not officially a prohibiting factor; and not only as a combat veteran WITH mental illness & neurological disorders, but with (1/2//Step)family with learning disabilities/neurological disorders...I think it should be.

A person could seize/fall-out on the button! (Lol)

Seriously though, if not loosely applying interpretations, and ensuring the difference between judging illness over shiite personalities/someone you just don't like...who decides? Where would it end?

Well all know money can't quite buy e v e r thing, but it can get close...

Also let us all agree that moolah(money) can CREATE hoopla(spectacle/projections/concepts/noise/etc...).

(BUUUT) Can Moolah erase, or "correct" hoopla?

Can a person solely create a narrative/public perception construct, using money alone? Or do public opinions require emotion and organic perception, even at some level?

Should a person with Autism/ANY mental, neurological, developmental, behavioral, etc...disorder be allowed to be in a high priority public office?

Does that/a person actually have Autism or are they using it as an excuse for deplorable behaviors and the authority to be really good at 1 thing?

We leave you with questions, let us know you're thoughts HERE!