Personally, none of us here in-house are: "true crime on dateline fans learning how to get away with murder"...lol, but the parental neglect and bouncing house/family to house/family aspects really got to us...We can relate.

So, in the overall peculiar case of Ms. Grace, there's a LOT of truth muddling, heavy acting, and other BULLS*** to sift through, but we're pretty good at that.

We are the bullsh***ers whom you can't! Our owner is a white trash expert! The epitome of the one to know whom you can take as! Get it?

It takes one to know one son and we got the full run on the lowdown of this clown town! (Mic drop)

Come, Let us fell the lies like winter stove wood!

Frame of reference-

So the "premise" of this story is an (overly-)affluent family adopted a (previously "used & returned") foreign, severely disabled orphan. The family was dissatisfied, the orphan felt abused, ultimately the then adoptive mother/family got it in their heads the girl was an adult posing as a child to "scam them" and continuously upped their claims of being in danger.

Ultimately using their affluence in money and connections to legally reage the orphan to drop her like rotten potatoes, which they did, legal troubles then ensued...

Now all of the "players" in this story have different perspectives, different "truths", but some things line up; at least enough to not ignore.

Even in the OCEAN of lies brought forth by all of these great fabricators, we found much of the truth! And regardless of what we ultimately think/who we may "side" with, there's one thing that's always true here that all of us "outsiders" can agree on:

ALL individuals involved, all of them, are compulsive liars who are obviously so lost in their own lies they've forgotten what the true bits they "peppered in" were.

Also even seem to buy-in to each/other parties lies, depending on how it helps their narrative. Typical liar sh**.

Also, all semantics and jokes aside, long before the orphan was reaged... WHERE THE HELL WERE THE SHRINERS IN ALL THIS?!

ANY one of the "adults" along the way could have easily gave a call and we bet they'd at least have supplied her with special shoes over the YEARS!

That's just (some of) what they do!

Key "Inferences"-

Some things to remember while reading our little expose: 

It's very obvious the dramatized Hulu show, not the documentary, wasn't concerned with the facts, but who is really? (Lol) The Barnett's guaranteed didn't have a problem with that adoption agency until they had a problem with the child, THEN it became a "shady agency"...No, it was shady in the beginning, but they didn't care because it was probably the most expedited "shopping" to get their new puppy!

A key factor for the female Barnett's paranoia, and something she really used to fuel the fire, was the fact the child had "pubic hair"...a few things there; it's quite generally agreed the Eastern Europeans are a hairy bunch, dark hair on ALL humans is more predominant in appearance, and you can easily research (if you so desire) that individuals with dwarfism (and some big folks) can have a "jacked" puberty timeline. So obviously a useless exaggeration that I can't believe anyone took seriously.

Then continuing with the "puberty" factor, let's consider the orphan's time at and all the statements made by the LaRue Carter "psychiatric hospital". There biggest comments/claims, which they were only brave enough to share anonymously over the phone, so who knows, were that she was "busty" and she was "propositioning men to be her boyfriend".

Okay, so, no matter how you look at it either her actual age or the re-age, she was either a preteen or early 20s. So let's say this facetiously...

No way, a pubescent female had boobs and was looking for a boyfriend? No way?! That's crazy!

Also like, "busty"? Really? Sure, okay, whatever you say...

Then they present a picture of the little girl doing a handstand like it's some feet of strength which is another reason they need to be worried about her being an adult who would physically assaulting them, like she's so strong...are you kidding?! First, it wasn't even a handstand it was a full forearm stand, and barely, and her bottom 1/2 doesn't weigh that much anyway; definitely coffee stir straws their grasping at there. 

Also through out all of this people mentioned the disabled orphan's (lack of) hygiene a lot. Well, any child or untrained teen left to fend for themselves are going to have difficulties, even in some pretty basic areas. Any untrained human with those types of disabilities will have difficulties, let alone a depressed human in pain, an over medicated human.

Those are just some things to remember as you read, or watch the same drivle we did.

The Beard/Warden-

Very obviously a moronic control freak, alpha wannabe, fame junkie who ruin the lives of everyone around her with her evil idiocy. (All Little people look older dumba**!) Easy to see that all of her videos or staged manipulations used to set the girl up.

She got lucky with having a highly above average son and dared to (essentially) take full credit for it, blatantly exploited him, then in her delusion thought that she could replicate. Excuse us, not just replicate, but repeat the creation of a genius in someone who can't walk straight and needs help using a spoon and going to the bathroom, yeah...sure batch!

With the constant attempts at entrapment, fabrication, and other manipulation it's easy to see how she was robbing the child and explaining it away... How do you think the rich get richer? Seems mostly like in idiotic woman who had just got done watching "The Orphan" after adopting her own orphan and maniacally created dots of her own to connect...Subconsciously, or maybe even cognitively, doing things like putting her coffee down in front of where the child was already spraying trying to help clean up. Going as far as to get police involved, saying that a very broken and weak crippled person, regardless of age, is trying to pull her into an electric fence trying to kill her... To create the "she's an adult psycho" narrative/motif...

However, even that specific scenario wasn't obvious fabrication/attempt at entrapment. With the "Trader's Creamery Incident", not only the field/farm manager but also ranch hands all said on camera it was common knowledge that that particular part of the electric fence was not even on that day, and the female adult caretaker was being entirely way more dramatic/enflamed than needed. "Take this evil wizard dwarf away!"

When the drama didn't work, she had no real facts To support her wild narrative, and sexual manipulation didn't work, what she resort to? What most people do...Self-righteous obstinence!

Ultimately, we think she herself is a closet case, but more of like a transexual closet case. Like she'd rather be a man, but a game man so she could still control and demean another man. (Bahahaha, but the universe wouldn't let that soul be born a man cuz it'd probably be the next/was Hitler!)

A normal, strong-willed child who couldn't learn literal rocket science overnight didn't fit into her 2 year plan...not "on brand"...gotta go new puppy!

The Closet Case/Cuck-

Pret-ty obviously a closeted homosexual, locked tied up in there! We can all agree He's at least a soy boy to an extent...A beta voluntarily breaking his own spirit to please a woman, which OF COURSE breeds resentment and rage! (Duh.) All this cry baby pleasing of women just because he can't admit the truth! 

Which, to speak of being a cry baby... You can see him progressively over the years get better at fake crying, It's quite very obvious. We even saw some interviews where we Saw him ourselves say, "gimme a moment", like it was a tough moment but what he was actually doing was working up tears; wasn't quite good enough at it yet and needed "a moment" to get the juices flowing.

He became quite the decent little actor right before our eyes! And most of his life's problems could have been avoided if he would just admit that he was gay. Even his lawyer saw it, didn't go as far as to say it, but he said: "I don't think he's the type of guy that would do well if he had to go to prison."

We had to laugh though and say: "No, he'd probably LOVE it there!" He's EXACTLY the "pleasing type" to survive, nay THRIVE, in prison. But rich gay man or not how did he not ALSO receive an obstruction of justice charge? 

So the girl in HIS OWN WORDS was an ADULT. Okay, so you don't take another adult's phone delete contacts and keep them from calling government agencies to receive services; ESPECIALLY when they're disabled. I guarantee we could work up a charge where he impeded and a government officials execution of office!

Dude was quite blatant in his grotesque attempts at entrapment, I mean his videos were shite, like donuts? really dude? 

Ultimately you shouldn't be worried about another person calling another person unless you're worried what that other person's going to say, and as long as you're living an honest life you shouldn't have to be worried about what another person's going to say about you, the end.

The "Genius"/Basement Scrub-

Have you ever seen a more guilty conscience? So yeah sure he's obviously a victim of exploitation and abuse from his parents, welcome to life!

This next part is wild speculation of course, no one would ever know, but I'm sure his "genius", can be attributed in the same way that the orphan's "psychopathy" originated. His dumb batch yuppie mom watched "Good Will Hunting" and went out the next morning and bought him a trig. book and some dry erase pens! Then he spent the next year or two not sleeping at all; secretly studying algebra 1, 2, geometry, precalc, and all the other things he needed to learn to catch up to that little book his mommy bought him; now making him nuts and seem like he has autism because he doesn't sleep at all and is under too much pressure! (?) [And Mommy says if we can convince people that I have autism they'll more believe that I'm super good at math! And then she can sell more books and buy me a Switch too!]

He's definitely culpable of, and quite obviously holds guilt for, physical and mental abuse upon this deformed tiny human; and regardless of if he was a child perpetuating his abuser's cycle; If he's the genius they all got credit for it he should have known better!

The eldest son, the prodigy, the (ahem) "genius", now the basement dweller because of his guilt and toxic upbringing. We have no sympathy for anybody who punches so far down, don't forget your vitamin D boy!

The Doormat/Psycho-

Quite obviously a lying sociopath, but they all are, and it's very much a "chicken or egg" quandary...

A textbook highly impressionable people pleaser that had to mature fast with next to zero instruction and mostly only bad influences. And obvious manipulator, especially in optics/how people perceive her, but wouldn't you be as well if that was really your only sense of control?

Seems like a very trusting, affectionate hound who was turned into a bad dog by multiple bad owners... And what do dogs who you won't stop kicking eventually do? 

We got to tell you, some of our mothers had ever pepper sprayed us, they might not have woken up...So good girl for NOT killing them! (Some of the beatings/physical abuse definitely seems to be corroborated by other parties, but if the pepper spraying was true...oof.)

Continuing, to feel on guard and the need to stash weapons to defend oneself against people that are constantly abusing you...umm...duh! You can scratch all that, that's normal, how many of you idiots are holding the GUN right now?! Or have a knife in your pocket, pepper spray on your keychain, weapons?! Act like it's not a norm!

We have to say though, from her recorded 2003 date of birth and adoption records, she wasn't in an orphanage THAT long, not that any amount of time would be great, but a couple things with that:

We think many of the orphan's "ether stories" from Ukraine are movie fabrications to support HER false narrative(s). Even the most professional, fanciest adoption agency in Ukraine, if intending to adopt the children out to America, is going to speak English to those children all the time/teach those children English. (Duh.)

So, when considering how people used her ability to speak English, her articulation, and (we'll say) toxic demeanor to REALLY "determine" her age... Let's tackle all that with some of our psychological experience and a little common sense.

Very easy to see how the orphanage could have taught her English. It's a testament to be used by the mindless grasping that straws, For she was also adopted by English speaking parents at a very young, still learning to speak, age.

A human born to such REAL adversity, NOT hardships perceived by color, gender, or class; MUST develop a strong will or die! Even if it's a will to survive by placating others...We know a fighter when we see one, and when you're someone like that who can't give/take REAL punches, you grow a natural ability/inclination towards the psychological/biological types of warfare, that's just how we humans are.

Same again, with ANY of us, when forced to mature and as our sole advocate at young ages, one becomes articulate or dies! Then OF COURSE her face, demeanor, and attitude got harder/meaner; abandoned, abused in most every way, constantly gas lit, punished, and treated like a dog until she got a touch of stockholm...I think you'd look like s*** too!

A little girl's obviously looking for attention, and got it in a major way! Who are any of us to say she doesn't deserve a little attention? We definitely identified at least a couple times though where others may have perceived it as such where we perceived it as someone literally calling for help...but in any case...

As decent speaking individuals, we have to laugh at people using her vocabulary against her. Like, aside from The Cuck pretending to cry all the time, it's the funniest thing to us.

Lady, you don't speak that well in the first place, so OF COURSE you'd have to say that this CHILD who speaks better than you is an adult, they'd have to be right? (LOAO!) Most (dumb) people do need to project onto others to protect their inadequacy, or rather, The delusion of lack thereof?

The Zealous Gangsters-

Quite a few stereotypes rolled into one here! Stereotypical hypochristians, church blacks, fat ugly woman, skinny angry man, they even have ANOTHER level of that stereotype working for them...The white fat hood rat and the skinny angry black man! We've seen this so many times in our own personal lives you CAN'T tell us it's not a stereotype!

Obviously living in a "house of cards" and with Nat. the cards got upgraded from punched casino throwaways to new Mavericks! This doesn't mean however that they had any intent of WANT when they decided to help.

Also, even if so, We laugh how everyone keeps going back to them "couping her benny checks"...No no no, they were after that Dr Phil money fool! (Laughs heartily) It's very obvious that where the Barnett's used fear of (&) severe punishment, shame of (current) self and other mental & physical craziness to control and brainwash...The Man(n)s' are using fear of abandonment, shame of (future) self, shame of spirit, and other mental & metaphysical craziness to control and brainwash.

They may actually believe they're good parents/people, but what we see are people distorting religion and using said distortions and delusions to manipulate narratives as best they can but they're not intelligent nor righteous enough to maintain defense of said narratives so they keep defaulting to "God said so..." "The devil is a liar..." and other idiotic obstinence for lack of REAL argument...not that the orphan's not also to blame for placating yet another manipulator.

OR, or: They're just "trashy" folks who know what it's like to suffer, work to alleviate their own suffering by helping do the same for others, and started the only way they knew how through the system. And everything that they're doing is them trying to be what they see as "good parents"? (It's all speculation when swimming in an ocean of lies!)

"Thems there fer tha pickin's"-

It's "HIGHlarious" to see all these different people with their so called "s*** together" act so impulsively.

We can essentially cover ALL "testimony" from neighbors during her time at the 1st apartment as yuppies/local yokels whose "truths" and opinions about the girl changed as impulsively as the weather.

We've already covered the hygiene and communication aspects, so we can pretty much dismiss this whole time frame as: 

A child who wouldn't stop going around people because she was praying that God someone would see through the bulls*** that even she was scared NOT to perpetuate! Essentially, silently, can't you smell me, don't you see that I'm a child, why won't you help me?

Then the "2" old ladies from that apartment complex; and we put two in quotations because we're quite certain it's the same lady, which is why they won't show the "other ones" face; are dumb. Just being honest, their opinions shouldn't be valued because they change with the wind. 80-year-old impressionable yuppie children! The end.

Then of course there's the entire dwarf family that essentially took the orphan on as an adult. Big or small, standard horrible "tru-crime" type women coming all shapes, sizes, and colors! Came out for the pickens as soon as she was legally able to and had seen it enough on TV herself that she knew there was enough eyes on it that she wouldn't be murdered... Let's roll the dice and get on TV!

Then like a controlling woman with a beta-ish husband, she was able to convince and/or manipulate them all to do what SHE wanted! It's common sense that if you got a sneak and run to do something it's probably not the right thing to do, Either way we'll probably end badly. Needless to say we were laughing our asses off the whole time during these parts of the documentary. Waiting to see when the "other shoe would drop" as it were. Meaning, it'll be interesting to see how the little martyr eventually says that this family "abuses" her, and equally funny to see how long it takes this family to get sick of their new puppy.

But then when they kind of quelled that potential narrative and put up cameras the little user went on lockdown, hiding out...Gotta seem abused in some way right? (Lol)

Then by the next episode the little wife said,

"Her trauma is way above my pay grade." (Verbatim)

Oh is the puppy you brought home to broken you impulsive, impetuous dummy?! Tell us again how to "handle a bully"???

Let's wrap up the playbill on this little drama!

(There are obviously many different types of people that adopt many different types of people for many different reasons...)

So, remembering this ⬆️ alibi, I have to say, unfortunately; There's nary a "good" reason, or need I guess, for adoption. First, I'll redundantly and rhetorically explain and you'll agree without a shadow of a doubt!

Is it GOOD for any child to need adoption? Is it good that that child's parent's:

>Died and/or were killed?

>Are incarcerated or crazy?

>Are abusive and/or hurtful to child?

>Received TBI from an accident and are now "remedial"?

>Or for whatever other reason are incapacitated to care for their child?

Is this a GOOD need for the child, are the GOOD things?

We pray that the end result from this horrible need brings good things for the child, but NO. A child needing to be adopted NEVER stems from a "good" reason, and a "good" adoptive family is a RESULT from a terrible need/reason.

"So okay, it's never great for the kid, but what about all the great people looking to adopt? All the ones that help children?"

Remember, I said: "There's nary a "good" reason, or need I guess, for adoption." I'll be so bold as to say ZERO! A person's reason/need to adopt a child is NEVER "good", here's the basis to my claim. 

MANY individuals who ACTUALLY want to, and feel the need to adopt a child do so why? ... ... ...

Because they're a barren couple. The couple cannot conceive life together and either have tried, can't afford, don't want to try, etc...invitro fertilization.

So, the REASON/NEED for them to adopt is because they're barren! Is that GOOD?! Is it good a loving couple fully dedicated to each other and able to take care of a family, can't? Is that good?

Then, honestly, if you really think about it...The plethora of other reasons we could come up with for someone to want to adopt another someone really fall under vanity, or vain-esque, reasons...

This "wide-jawed warden type" being the most perfectly disgusting example! Literally buying a humanoid, like a fedora wearing monkey, 'for them clicks yo'!

Seriously though, typically disguised as "reaching out to help another" in some fashion; those NOT barren WITH children usually adopt MORE children in some awful attempt to save and doomed marriage; or for money, prestige/clout, and/or a delusional form of penance for their warped soul. We'd obviously never know this, because it's information that they keep secret in that hidden/darkest spot of that warped soul!

So, it's forever just wild speculation in that regard...

However; really, no matter how you look at it, ALL adoptions originate, perpetuate, and exist forever in and with some form of pain, resentment, vanity, resentment of pain and vanity. Resentment projected from both parties onto the other, resentment between the adoptive couple, on and on...it's just a dice roll for ALL parties in ALL adoptions, but especially adoptions containing disabled parties. The psychology behind adoption is always rough, and I hope you now agree that the 100% necessary need for adoption never stems from good needs/reasons.

And, in this case especially, humans aren't puppies you can take back to the pound or let loose in another town!

D.N.A. doesn't lie! D.N.A. lies less than video cameras! Video cameras CAN lie, D N.A. does NOT! So, 100% fact is that the age/date of birth listed on the hospital records of the delivery visit of the biological mother, who was D.N.A. tested on film, IS the age of the child born that day, ZERO question. She may have been in an orphanage for a while, but not too long considering D.o.B. and adoption records.

This makes this 2nd truth exist: It was a sincere and deliberate miscarriage of justice on the judge(s)/court(s) that disallowed mention of her appropriate biological, not legal, age; during cases seeking punishment and restitution from any Barnett(s).

Finally, truth in the form of a question? Now that there's multiple occurrences from different parties of admitting on video that physical abuse occurred is that not enough for an indictment of assault and battery? Doesn't matter their age, one can't do that to another, so is there some statute of limitations on physical violence charges?

Really, just a bunch of pathetic m-fers in good people shells, for various reasons, and applied to all parties involved. Same applies that everyone involved is a user and/or abuser, aside from those caught in this particular limelight through friendly fire like the DePaul husband...

If half of any of this s*** is true that Kristine person definitely belongs in jail! Another disgustingly stereotypical "strong" woman that ruined the lives of everyone around her with her "independent" nature! That doesn't take away from the fact that "Little Orphan Annie" is a lying user. She'll always need a "savior", always. It's a martyr-ish, but more over a "damaged damsel in distress" complex, that's the framework we see anyway...

And either it's not R.A.D. that she has, but more a SLEW of personality disorders and trauma, or we have R.A.D. also! But we think where that confusion comes in is with her acting/conditioning/placating... It's a very familiar, standard behavior in (manipulative) children to bad mouth the one caregiver/parent to the other to satisfy a narrative because a child thinks that's what the other person/parent wants, or more than likely was unequivocally made to think that by a set of sh**ty supervisors!

Towards the end of the documentary it seems very odd the behavior with the DePaul's, Man(n)s', & her... Everyone began to wonder what it was that these people had on her? Why she was still so loyal after having to run away??? It was left for us to infer that they had some sort of sexual material/content that they could release against her...SURE BATCH!

You want the truth we got the "truth"!

Being trashy, hoodrat, drug users ourselves; it became pretty obvious right away to us that they had done drugs together...and we think, she would rather think, the you think that her family holds her hostage with a "sex tape" as opposed for us to KNOW that she's a crackhead. We know plenty of folks with much less (reasons for) pain that take some bad self medications.

The hiding out at the DePaul's was (probably) a form of detox/rehab, and it's honestly probably once that the loudmouth hood rat came clean about the girl being a junkie with them that's DePaul's put cameras INSIDE their house! Then they all probably as a whole agreed on the "sexual narrative" by the DePaul's probably threatening to out them as junkies as well, tit for tat.

If you don't think an addict can run a "hood church" you're an idiot!

Of course we're all idiots for watching the show(s)...

Just another example of an idiot bearing their soul and sharing all of their problems on f***ing television/the net, while saying:

"I don't really like sharing my problems."

Umm, bit** that's ALL you do!

...but even if true, ultimate fact is that big jawed Barnett beard needs locked up! For each year a CHILD under her care was abandoned to suit her narrative, with the closet case sharing the sentence. We can even be "fair" and let them split it; abandon a minor for 4 years, you each get 2, IN PRISON!

Preferably with a bunch of angry inmate who really miss their kids, and have heard their story.

>Most "factual" information used to derive context for this info-opinionative editorial was sourced from the 3 season documentary entitled: "The Curious Case of Natalia Grace" on Hulu.

>Some "perception of perspective" information used to derive context for this info-opinionative editorial was sourced from the Hulu drama based on these events entitled: "The Good Family".

>Certain psychological perspectives, paradigms, and other construct information; particularly on family dynamics, drug use, and certain psychological disorders & speculations of any/all, provided by:

• Personal experience w/abusive family. Where multiple siblings/children were removed by literally church AND state; time in shelters & w/multiple surrogate families; other experiences.
• Military training including, but not limited to, psychological training for counter insurgency, intelligence gathering, & combat operations.
• Personal battles with drug use and growing up in said "drug/addicted" household/culture.
• Employment training while an "enforcement officer" of probationary/parole requirements, specifically drug testing and being able to tell if someone is (lying about) doing drugs.

>Some inferences made using intelligence and even just a little: general common sense!

>Certain information used in reference is provided by ADA and NIMH, specifically, about mental health and laws regarding disabled individuals of ANY age.